Beyond the cloud: SLMs, local AI, agentic constellations, biology and a high value direction for AI progress

The local imperative

The best technology disappears, integrating so seamlessly it feels like an extension of yourself. For AI, this means moving beyond the chat window and toward an invisible, magical layer of ambient cognition. This isn't just about you prompting an AI; it's about the AI taking the initiative to prompt you.

Imagine a silent partner that sees your flight is delayed, checks the calendars of your meeting attendees, and proactively suggests a new time that works for everyone, asking with a simple prompt, “Your flight is delayed by an hour. I found a new slot at 3 PM that works for everyone. Shall I move the meeting?” This is a partnership where the AI acts without being annoying, surfacing only at the most pivotal moments, governed by principles that ensure every interruption provides more value than it costs in attention.

This level of deep, contextual integration requires trust, privacy, and performance that remote, cloud-based models are ill-suited to deliver. The only way to build this future is on-device.

The gift of constraints

This move to a local-first world comes with a powerful, hidden benefit: it forces us to abandon the "scale-up cheat code." For years, the prevailing wisdom has been to simply build bigger models — a brute-force approach akin to assuming the only path to intelligence is inflating a primate's neocortex, ignoring the crucial architectural shifts and new connections that actually gave rise to human cognition [1].

A principled stance on exploring AI in the sub-billion-parameter scale is primed to catalyze a new wave of innovation. By embracing resource constraints, we are forced to get creative and focus on the fundamental components of intelligence. This is not a step back; it's a leap toward a more elegant and sophisticated approach to building AI.

The new frontier: architecture, algorithms, and orchestration

Running locally opens up a rich new research frontier. The AI must be a polite guest on your device, running silently without spiking your CPU or draining your battery [17, 18]. This requires breakthroughs beyond just managing models.

The most fundamental challenge is architectural. How do we design models that are powerful because of their efficiency, not in spite of their size? The goal is to create compact reasoning engines, likely at the 1B-parameter scale, that excel at pure problem-solving skill rather than encyclopedic knowledge. This is made possible by advanced optimization techniques like knowledge distillation [8, 9], pruning [10, 11], and quantization [12], which intelligently compress the capabilities of larger models into a smaller footprint. Recent work on novel, brain-inspired architectures like the Hierarchical Reasoning Model (HRM) demonstrates this is incredibly promising, showing that a model with just 27 million parameters can achieve exceptional performance on complex reasoning tasks without massive pre-training, a modern validation of long-standing principles in recurrent, hierarchical intelligence [47, 48, 49].

On top of better models, it introduces the fascinating orchestration problem. The solution is an Agentic Constellation — a team of hyper-efficient SLMs managed by a resource-aware orchestrator. As recent research argues, for the majority of repetitive and specialized tasks that agents perform, SLMs are not just sufficient, but inherently more suitable than their larger counterparts [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. However, a critical and largely unaddressed crisis looms over the field: today's multi-agent systems are fundamentally brittle, prone to systemic failures like "Reasoning-Action Mismatch" where an agent's plan doesn't match its action [40]. This reveals a dangerous gap between our ability to construct these systems and our understanding of how to make them reliable.

Nature's blueprint

With the challenges of local constraints, architecture, and reliability clearly defined, biology becomes the most natural source of inspiration. While not a perfect engineering diagram, it is the only working model we have for an intelligence that solves these exact problems [45]. The brain's brilliance emerges from a cooperative of deeply interconnected, specialized regions working in concert on a shockingly low power budget [46].

This points toward architectures inspired by profound neuroscientific frameworks like the Thousand Brains Theory, where intelligence emerges from a consensus of thousands of parallel models, not a top-down command [50]. It suggests agents built on principles like the Free Energy Principle, making them intrinsically motivated to learn and reduce their own uncertainty about the world, a direct solution to the reliability crisis [51]. These are not just beautiful analogies; they are direct, actionable principles for designing the next generation of robust, reliable AI.

The path forward

The argument is a straight line: the need for truly integrated AI demands a local architecture for privacy, lower latency, and offline availability (whether on a plane or in space). This imposes constraints that kill the scale-up cheat code, forcing us to solve the more interesting problems of model architecture, learning, and orchestration. And for that, biology provides the best guide.

This is more than a technical choice; it's a better direction for everyone. For users, it means a truly personal and private AI. For the industry, it means sustainable economics, with some analyses showing local inference can be over 1,000 times cheaper than cloud APIs [13]. This efficiency isn't just about saving money for companies; it's what makes it possible for this powerful AI to run on your phone without draining your battery in five minutes.

For researchers, this is a call to explore a new frontier. The challenges of efficient architectures, novel algorithms, and solving the systemic reliability crisis in agentic AI are among the most fascinating and unsolved problems today. For founders, this represents a clear market opportunity to build a new generation of intelligent applications — ones that can deliver a level of privacy, responsiveness, and integration that centralized incumbents can never match, with business models that pass these efficiencies on to users.

The ultimate goal has always been to build technology that empowers us. By creating these local, "neocortical" constellations of cognition, we can finally make an AI that does so in the most profound way: by disappearing into a silent, powerful extension of our own minds.

References

[1] Wikipedia. (2024). Large language model.

[2] Belcak, P., Heinrich, G., Diao, S., Fu, Y., Dong, X., Muralidharan, S., Lin, Y. C., & Molchanov, P. (2025). Small Language Models are the Future of Agentic AI. arXiv:2506.02153.

[3] Splunk. (2025, February 17). LLMs vs. SLMs: The Differences in Large & Small Language Models.

[4] arXiv. (2025, July). Pre-trained Tiny Language Models Exhibit Features Qualitatively Similar to Large Language Models. arXiv:2507.14871.

[5] arXiv. (2025, July). Domain-Adaptive Small Language Model for Hierarchical Tax Code Prediction. arXiv:2507.10880.

[6] arXiv. (2025, July). Language Model Cascades for Knowledge Extraction. arXiv:2507.22921.

[7] Future AGI. (2025). Small Language Models are the Future of Agentic AI.

[8] arXiv. (2025, July). AdvDistill: A Reward-Guided Dataset Distillation Framework for Reasoning. arXiv:2507.00054.

[9] OpenReview. (2025). Making Distillation for Finetuning More Efficient with Feedback and Rationales.

[10] Superannotate. (2024). Small Language Models (SLMs): A Complete Guide.

[11] arXiv. (2025, February). Adapt-Accel: A Layer-wise Adaptive Acceleration Paradigm for Small Language Models. arXiv:2502.03460.

[12] Effective Altruism Forum. (2025). Impact of quantization on small language models (SLMs) for multilingual mathematical reasoning.

[13] arXiv. (2025, July). The AI Shadow War: SaaS vs. Edge Computing Architectures. arXiv:2507.11545.

[14] DDN. (2025, June 20). Overcoming Top Challenges when Deploying AI.

[15] A3Logics. (n.d.). Challenges of Deploying LLMs.

[16] Coherent Market Insights. (2025, June). On-Device AI Market Report.

[17] NVIDIA. (n.d.). ChatRTX GitHub Repository.

[18] Built In. (2024, February). What Is Chat with RTX?.

[19] Apple Developer. (n.d.). Core ML.

[20] GeeksforGeeks. (2025, July 23). Top 7 Trends in Edge Computing.

[21] Engiware. (2023, October 18). Llama2 Ports Extensive Benchmark Results on Mac M1 Max.

[22] PowerInfer.ai. (n.d.). About PowerInfer.

[23] arXiv. (2023, December). PowerInfer: Fast Large Language Model Serving with a Consumer-grade GPU. arXiv:2312.12456.

[24] arXiv. (2025, July). Agent-Centric Economy: A Structural Vision for Future AI. arXiv:2507.03904.

[25] Xiatech. (n.d.). Composable AI.

[26] Langbase. (n.d.). Composable AI.

[27] Medium. (n.d.). Composable AI Agents for the Web: BaseAI’s Modular Approach to AI Development.

[28] MuleSoft Blog. (n.d.). 3 ways composability enables AI.

[29] IBM Think. (n.d.). AI agent orchestration.

[30] Salesforce. (n.d.). AI Agent Frameworks: A Practical Guide.

[31] Microsoft. (n.d.). AutoGen GitHub Repository.

[32] Microsoft Research Forum. (2025, February 25). AutoGen v0.4: Reimagining the foundation of agentic AI.

[33] Medium. (n.d.). Inside AutoGen Chapter 7: Core Agents & Runtime.

[34] WordPress. (2025, March 4). AutoGen v0.4: A Complete Guide to the Next Generation of Agentic AI.

[35] instinctools. (2025, July 31). AutoGen vs. LangChain vs. CrewAI.

[36] Composio Blog. (n.d.). OpenAI Agents SDK vs LangGraph vs AutoGen vs CrewAI.

[37] IBM Think. (n.d.). Popular AI agent frameworks.

[38] LangChain. (n.d.). LangGraph.

[39] LangChain. (n.d.). The platform for reliable agents.

[40] arXiv. (2025, April 22). Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail? A Comprehensive Taxonomy of Failure Modes. arXiv:2503.13657.

[41] arXiv. (2025, June). TRiSM for Agentic AI: A Trust, Risk, and Security Management Framework. arXiv:2506.04133.

[42] Tepper School of Business. (2025, February 12). The Ethical Challenges of AI Agents.

[43] Infosys BPM. (n.d.). Agents in AI: Ethical Considerations, Accountability, and Transparency.

[44] IBM Think. (n.d.). What are the primary challenges and risks associated with agentic AI architectures?.

[45] CAPES. (n.d.). Neuroscience and AI.

[46] IMR Press. (n.d.). How does the human brain's architecture, particularly the neocortex, inspire new approaches to artificial intelligence?.

[47] arXiv. (2025, June 26). Hierarchical Reasoning Model. arXiv:2506.2174.

[48] ResearchGate. (2025, August 2). Hierarchical Reasoning Model (HRM): A Neuroscience-Inspired....

[49] Reddit. (n.d.). r/LocalLLaMA - HRM solved thinking more than current "thinking" models.

[50] Numenta. (2019, January 16). The Thousand Brains Theory of Intelligence.

[51] Wikipedia. (2025, June 17). Free energy principle.